Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephen Beck Marcotte's avatar

Great stuff Kelpie! I hope I have your support in saying this as well. I think RFK is all in on it.

While I agree that biochar is awesome for agriculture, forestry, watersheds, the ocean, groundwater, atmosphere, etc….

Economics matter. So how do you deploy the pyrolysis technology economically speaking in its teenage years? Once the pyrolysis ecosystem is in adulthood it will terra preta the earth, and solve so many solid waste management and human health problems that plague our society.

I believe the decentralized wastewater disposal (septic system) industry is a well positioned low hanging fruit new economic biochar application at this time.

We should incorporate biochar into the septic system market as an additive to the “construction sand”. Brita filter beds.

It IS one the last frontier in water treatment. I could easily convince engineers, designers and contractors to use it, if it makes economic and emotional sense.

Expand full comment
Ignasi Cubina's avatar

Not cynical at all Kelpie, but native to place. I was following Ribert Kenedy Jr during the covid episode because it resonated well on me, and just by chance I got stuck watching him in a youtube video in a kind of congressional session, his voice and look is making him very distinguishable, definitely. As a biologsit/biochemist and Cradle to Cradle ambassador for almost two decades I’m a strong believer than waste - including tocicity/pollution - and our wasteful soxiety is the fundamental root cause of most of our environmental, social and economical - yes, economical - burdens, risks and inequalities. Voting for Trump is a waste decision? I don’t know and I agree that democrats haven’t done much either. But I’m not a US citizen, amd I don’t know the country enough to judge. I don’t like the man at all, he looks to me just the opposite to Robert F.Kennedy Jr, but it’s a perfeption. Human comes from Humus, and Humility is bound. Being humble - and this is also a spiritual feature whether you believe in God or not - is what makes SOIL on top of the list. Native to place is where wisdom meets ecology, and BIOCHAR can connect all the dots, including mineral based materials. Quantifying impacts without Qualifying them is not a sound ecological approach, I agree, but you need both and assees things within context. You know it better than me. Current solar income is enegy not fuel, Biochar is Carbon as a matter, not fuel. The reasoning behind the lack of replacement capcity of solar and wind (both are solar) for fossil fuels I feel is the same as the reasoning for the non-scalability of Biochar - material resource management (e.g. materials being used in pyrolisers could be an issue at scale). And in bith cases the response is in the soil, whether you remediate or you deplete it for mining. Let’s be humble and make soil integrity the foundational of a new prosperous civilization, when possible.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts